
February 10, 2008
Space
Thanks, Steve, for getting Modern Bend going. Privileged to be a part of it.
Space has always been available. Look at America from the air. Only 4% of the country is built upon. All this space has bred a sense that what we do with it isn't that important. The community that mandates forward-thinking land use policy is a rarity: planning principles aren't typically invoked unless they're reacting to something already built. It's like a teacher having no rules until her classroom is out of control.
We like to contrast ourselves with the Dutch or Scandinavians, and planners often (and accurately) grumble that we're a generation behind them in progressive land use policy. But remember that their population densities are much greater, and the sense of personal space is nothing like ours. So they don't have a culture steeped in space like the American west does. That's a huge obstacle to overcome. But now that energy costs and a floundering economy are realities, we at last can no longer afford to defer to the way it's been done in the past.
People often look at the dramatic drop in construction activity and say 'now's the time to catch up on planning, and to craft a vision for the future while we catch our breath'. The irony is that long term planning is funded directly by revenues from development applications. When those applications are down, as they are now, the ability to fund the 'big look' comes into question. We have recently reshuffled revenues to keep long term planning funded, with an eye trained specifically on the expansion of the UGB. But there's more to planning than that. Good planning prevents crime, reduces traffic, enhances quality of life and creates vibrant, economically diverse communities. I bet 70% of people would agree with that, but ask them if they're willing to pay for it and that number's gonna drop in half.
So Bend has some hard choices ahead. It's easy to say 'we don't want to become indistinguishable from Toledo, Topeka or Tampa', but are we really willing to invest in our community to make it so?
Posted by Peter Gramlich at 4:00 PM
Comments (2):
Steve Robertson writes:
Good stuff, Peter...seemingly distinctive communities around the world are labled distinctive given one of two things being in place; either a very unique physical setting or a built environment fueled by wealth at various points in its history. Either way these are highly visible and memorable elements of any distinctive community.
But what else is at work? Leonardo DaVinci also worked on canal systems and harbors throughout Italy. Aquaducts had to deliver fresh water to Rome. The grid system of Paris and very strong architectural guidelines continues to deliver a world-class urban environment for its citizens and its visitors.
Clearly, even distinctive communities will not last long if the infrastructure and technolgy that supports them does not allow for long-term success.
Therein lies a posed conumdrum...(thank you, Peter)... most recently new infrastructure in Bend (including distinctive, art infused round-a-bouts and parks) has been largley paid for with significant growth via the development community. How does/should/can that be shifted to include a more democratic sharing of costs within the business community, the medical community, the educational community and our citizenry? Will we support what is necessary? A balance needs to be struck predicated on shared beliefs and then consensus reached on what must be tackled first if we are to affect the desired result in an efficient (cost-effective) fashion.
That desired result is the fundamental first mover. Are there any big ideas floating about that will drive that discussion forward and engage this community. Indeed..how about Juniper Ridge for starters? Bend 2030 needs to lead this charge in my opinion. They have already established a broad base of community support and participation.
Posted by Steve Robertson at 2008-02-11 16:52:36
Mary Robertson writes:
Hi Peter and Steve,
This is a powerful read and I hope everyone reads what you both have to say.
M


